JACKSON NOMINATION

After President Joe Biden’s nomination of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, attention now turns to the Senate’s advice-and-consent process. It takes a simple majority in the Senate to confirm a nominee to the court. The chamber is split 50-50, with Vice President Kamala Harris able to cast the decisive vote in the event of a tie.

Here’s how senators from both parties reacted to the nomination on Friday.

Key Democrats

Two moderate Democrats – Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Joe Manchin of West Virginia – frequently hold the pivotal votes in the Senate, and they have shown willingness to block Biden’s legislative initiatives. Neither Sinema nor Manchin, however, has voted against a single one of Biden’s judicial nominees for the lower courts. Both issued non-committal statements on Friday about Jackson’s nomination.

Sinema said she looks forward to meeting Jackson, adding that she evaluates all judicial nominees based on their professional qualifications, their belief in an independent judiciary, and whether they would uphold the rule of law. “I take seriously my constitutional duty to provide advice and consent, ” she said.

Statement on Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Nomination for the Supreme Court pic.twitter.com/S5Ne1VX309

— Kyrsten Sinema (@SenatorSinema) February 25, 2022

Manchin issued a similar statementsaying he would assess Jackson’s “record, legal qualifications and judicial philosophy to serve on the highest court in the land.”

I look forward to meeting with Judge Jackson before determining whether to provide my consent.

— Senator Joe Manchin (@Sen_JoeManchin) February 25, 2022

Republicans to watch

Last June, three Republican senators joined all 50 Democrats in voting to confirm Jackson to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Those three Republicans are Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Susan Collins of Maine, and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.

Graham publicly lobbied Biden to nominate J. Michelle Childs, a district judge from his home state of South Carolina. Graham (as well as Rep. Jim Clyburn, DS.C.) said Childs would bring much-needed educational diversity to the court because she attended public universities. Shortly after news broke that Biden had selected Jackson (who has undergraduate and law degrees from Harvard), Graham tweeted that “the radical Left has won President Biden over yet again.” “The Harvard-Yale train to the Supreme Court continues to run unabated,” he added.

If media reports are accurate, and Judge Jackson has been chosen as the Supreme Court nominee to replace Justice Breyer, it means the radical Left has won President Biden over yet again.

The attacks by the Left on Judge Childs from South Carolina apparently worked.

— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) February 25, 2022

Collins released a brief statement: “Ketanji Brown Jackson is an experienced federal judge with impressive academic and legal credentials. I will conduct a thorough vetting of Judge Jackson’s nomination and look forward to her public hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee and to meeting with her in my office.”

Murkowski released a similar statement on Friday afternoon, adding: “I’ve been clear that previously voting to confirm an individual to a lower court does not signal how I will vote for a Supreme Court justice. I am committed to doing my due diligence before making a final decision on this nominee. Being confirmed to the Supreme Court — the nation’s highest tribunal, and a lifetime appointment — is an incredibly high bar to achieve.”

Judiciary Committee members

Before the full Senate votes on Jackson’s nomination, the Senate Judiciary Committee will examine her record and question her over several days of hearings. Here’s what some members of the committee have said:

• Dick DurbinD-Ill., chair of the committee, said “President Biden has chosen an extraordinary nominee in DC Circuit Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson.” The committee, he said, “will begin immediately to move forward on her nomination with the careful, fair , and professional approach she and America are entitled to.”
• Chuck GrassleyR-Iowa, the committee’s ranking Republican, said: “I look forward to meeting with Judge Jackson face to face on Capitol Hill in the coming days, and working with Senator Durbin to finalize the committee’s initial questionnaire and records request, as is customary in this process. As ranking member, I have no intention of degrading the advice and consent role as Senate Democrats have in recent confirmations. I intend to show up and do the job that Iowans pay me to do.”
• Marsha BlackburnR-Tenn., called Biden’s announcement of his nominee during Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine “extremely inappropriate.”
• Sheldon WhitehouseDR.I., said Jackson is “a thoroughly qualified nominee.” Responding to Republican criticism, Whitehouse added, “I hope my colleagues across the aisle consider Judge Jackson in good faith, as our Founders envisioned when entrusting the Senate with the responsibility to provide advice and consent. Even before this nominee was named, the right-wing donors who packed the Court under President Trump sought to disparage Justice Breyer’s replacement, alleging the same dark-money scheme that they, themselves, hatched and executed.”
• Ted CruzR-Texas, said on Friday evening: “While I have concerns about how President Biden is handling this nomination process, I look forward to evaluating Judge Jackson on her record, views, and judicial philosophy alone. Sadly, Senate Democrats have undermined the American people’s confidence in previous judicial confirmation processes with vicious personal smears and unfounded accusations. … I believe Judge Jackson should be treated with the dignity and decorum that has been lacking from the consideration of past nominations.” He added, “While I previously voted against confirming Judge Jackson to her current position on the DC Circuit, I will engage in careful consideration of her nomination.”
• Richard BlumenthalD-Conn., called Jackson’s nomination “truly thrilling” and said, “She is a star — an example of the best of America.” Blumenthal later tweeted praise of the reference in Jackson’s speech at the White House to Constance Baker Motely, a Connecticut native.
• Other statements from Judiciary Committee members: Cory BookerDN.J.; Chris CoonsD-Del.; Diane FeinsteinD-Cal.; Mazie HironoD-Hawaii; Amy KlobucharD-Minn.; Patrick LeahyD-Vt.; Jon OssoffD-Ga.; John CornynR-Texas; Josh HawleyR-Mo.; John KennedyR-La.; Mike LeeR-Utah; Ben SasseR-Neb.; and Thom TillisRN.C.

Party leadership

• Senate Majority Leader Chuck SchumerDN.Y., wrote on Twitter that “Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is an excellent choice to be the next Supreme Court Justice!” and that she will “protect the rights of Americans, including the voiceless and vulnerable.”
• Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellR-Ky., congratulated Jackson and said he looks forward to a careful review of her record. “I voted against confirming Judge Jackson to her current position less than a year ago,” he said. “Since then, I understand that she has published a total of two opinions, both in the last few weeks, and that one of her prior rulings was just reversed by a unanimous panel of her present colleagues on the DC Circuit.” He also claimed that Jackson was “the favored choice of far-left dark-money groups.”
• Democratic National Committee Chair Jaime Harrison, Black Caucus Chair Virgie Rollins, and Women Caucus Chair Lottie Shackelford wrote, “Judge Jackson will live up to the legacy of Justice Breyer and the other qualified jurists that have served and continue to serve on the Supreme Court. I fully expect the Senate will agree and confirm Judge Jackson with bipartisan support — as they have three times before. … For too long, Black women have not seen themselves represented on our nation’s highest court — a court that renders decisions that affect their daily lives on everything from reproductive freedom to voting rights. When the Senate confirms Judge Jackson, that will finally change.”
• The Republican National Committee called Jackson “a radical, left-wing activist who would rubberstamp Biden’s disastrous agenda.” The RNC also called her a “Democrat partisan” and described her work as a lawyer representing people detained at Guantánamo Bay as “defending terrorists.”