Scott Ritter’s Twitter re-ban, Kafka-esque copycat support, are all about anti-Russian propaganda

Scott Ritter’s Twitter re-ban, Kafka-esque copycat support, are all about anti-Russian propaganda

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

[ad_1]

Unfortunately, Scott Ritter is articulate, with good reason, and doggedly insists that we offend the officialdom. This landed him on Twitter’s permanent spam list.we will review His current must-read articles on consortium news Painfully detailed why his second ban this month was based on apparently fabricated allegations. To make matters worse, Twitter allowed people impersonating Scott Ritter to set up shop, even though that was a clear violation of Twitter’s own policies and identity theft laws in New York, where Ritter lives, and in California, where Twitter is headquartered.

Ritter is far from the only once-famous Twitter voice suspended for misconceptions about Ukraine:

Although it needs to be proven by discovery that it meets the “preponderance of evidence” standard, Twitter’s stance as a narrative executor does make it walk and talk like a state actor.

For context, the former UN weapons inspector is one of the loudest, most stubborn and most effective critics of the false “Iraqi WMD” claim that underlies our invasion. Ritter has been touring all the time now, mostly on non-mainstream leftist shows like CN Live! Greyzone, Maverick Multimedia and the Antiwar Coalition and stereotyped fraternal liberal rights such as The Duran and Gonzalo Lira. Oh, and he also took the liberty of appearing on banned RT.

Ritter’s version of the war is firmly opposed to the version reported in the media: Russia is winning, and will win decisively. He was overly optimistic about the timeline, but detailed how Russia engages in classic “maneuver warfare” to shape the battlefield and determine the nature and timing of engagement. He also stressed that media employees and so-called military experts who have never seen a day of fighting keep projecting American methods onto Russia, thereby completely misunderstanding what is going on. Russia did not go the US route, phasing out electricity, cell towers, internet and railroads from the start. It also didn’t bomb the city to rubble, which it easily did. Instead, it downplayed civilians, took on more military losses, and waged the war in a more gradual fashion, slowly but systematically destroying Ukraine’s ability to wage war while avoiding its cities as much as possible. Russia followed Clausewitz, who believed the quickest path to victory was to destroy armies, not cities.

It’s all good enough to endure for a while. But then Ritter tweeted on Bucha, and Twitter is Twitter, and he was limited to his bottom line:

The Ukrainian National Police committed numerous crimes against humanity in Bukha. Biden sought to blame the Butcha murders on Russia for aiding and abetting those crimes. Congrats America…We made another presidential war criminal! “

as Ritter explained In his current consortium news article, He supports the provocative statement. Assuming he wants others to see his work, we’ll take the liberty of quoting in detail:

On the TV screen in front of me, the President of the United States is making an appearance, speaking about the Butcha killings. “You may recall that I was criticized for calling Putin a war criminal,” Biden tells gathered reporters“Well, the truth of the matter,” he continued, “you saw what happened in Butcha….

i just finished An article in Russia Today (RT) About the Butcha incident…

The available data from Bucha is ultimately inconclusive, but if anything, strongly suggests that Ukraine is the culprit, not the Russians. The certainty expressed by the President leads me to believe that he knows classified information otherwise unavailable to the public…It looks like I might be in the awkward position of having to retract my conclusions and correct the record…

However, shortly after Biden spoke, my phone alerted me A Reuters article The headline read: “Pentagon unable to independently confirm Ukrainian Buccha atrocities, officials say.”  ….

I turned off the TV and continued to spend the next 40 minutes or so researching the available information about the Buddha event.One of the major news reports is A sort of New York era Report According to the article’s authors, Malachy Browne, David Botti and Haley Willis, the commercial imagery claimed to have been taken on March 19, 2022, disproves Russia’s claim that its troops were withdrawn from Bucha on March 30 without bodies. present.

However, when I looked at the video and still photos of the Buddha’s body, it struck me that they did not appear to have been left to rot in the streets for two weeks (the bodies were “discovered” by the Ukrainian National Government police on April 2nd .)frankly speaking, The body begins to swell about 3-5 days after death, usually doubling in size. They remain in this state for up to ten days before bursting, spilling a pool of decomposing liquid on the ground around the corpse.

in comparison New York Times‘Picture with video of dead body on the ground, I was shocked by a scene in the movie my cousin Vinny, New York street lawyer Vincent Gambini, played by Joe Pesci, cross-examines a witness about preparing the grit. “Do we believe that boiling water soaks into grit faster in your kitchen than anywhere on earth? Well, maybe the laws of physics don’t hold on to your stove anymore!” …

The available evidence that can be extracted from Bucha’s images shows that, by appearance, the bodies appear to have been killed within 24-36 hours of their discovery – meaning they were killed after the Russians evacuated Bucha. However, the exact time of death can only be determined after a thorough forensic examination.

Many of the corpses had strips of white cloth tied to their upper arms, a visual sign that either they were loyal to Russia or the men were not a threat to Russians. Corpses without this white cloth tend to have their hands tied behind their backs, and the white cloth looks similar to the markings on the arms of other corpses.

Near many of the bodies was a green cardboard box decorated with a white star containing Russian military dry rations distributed by Russian troops to civilians in Bukha during humanitarian operations.

In short, there is evidence that the bodies were Russian-friendly or sympathetic civilians…

April 2, An article appeared on the official Ukrainian government websiteLB.ua, titled “Special Forces ‘SAFARI’ regiment begins to clear Russian saboteurs and accomplices.” The article states, “Special forces begin to clear the city of Bukha in the Kyiv region liberated by the Ukrainian Armed Forces from Russian forces Molecules and accomplices.” The article stated that the safari group was composed of personnel from multiple SWAT units, including the Rapid Action Response Unit and the Tactical Action Response Police.

and other information – a video Ukrainian officials have warned citizens of Bukha to stay indoors and not panic, as a “cleaning operation” will take place in Bukha on April 1.other videoalso starting on April 1, allegedly showed members of the Safari Corps shooting civilians who did not wear the blue distinctive armbands that symbolize loyalty to the Ukrainian cause.

Ritter goes on to tell part of the story of Twitter’s kangaroo court. He was suspended for “abuse and harassment”.

This is ridiculous because the only person Ritter spoke badly about was Joe Biden. If Ritter did threaten Biden, he would soon be kicked out by the FBI. Instead, he just called Biden a war criminal, which this site (for Yemen) has done, and many others have done for every US president dating back at least to Clinton. Even for defamation, where the legal threshold is much lower, public figures are seen as accustomed to criticism.

Many Twitterati complained about Twitter bans. Ritter was reinstated at the end of April 6. By the morning of April 10, he was banned again. It has all the hallmarks of someone relying on Twitter to revert to their original stance.

Twitter cites Ritter’s reply to the April 3 tweet… which has been deleted by its author @MattGallagher0 so the whole world can’t even censor one side of the exchange. Here’s Ritter’s response:

Marines [murdered] Haditha killed more Iraqis than Russians in Bucha because Haditha was not a false flag mass murder. On the other hand, Butcha…

If you care about the details, Ritter explains Haditha in his article, and he also sometimes mentions it in his videos.

The tweet was again described as harassment and abuse. Obviously not. Instead, Twitter has a zero-tolerance policy on anyone who says Bucha does look like Ukrainian capers.

Ritter has companies:

Now we come to the part where Twitter makes it clear that it offers Ritter. I won’t go into the painful and absurd details that Ritter documented on Consortium News. But the short version is that Twitter allowed the Ritter copycat to set up shop, and the copycat made it clear that his account was the restored account of the old @realScottRitter. Despite Ritter’s protests, Twitter refused to take down the fake account, despite clear violations of Twitter’s policies and laws against identity theft.

Frankly, this is stupid for Twitter because it makes their vendetta against Ritter indisputable rather than acting on company policy.

Glenn Greenwald has the ability to describe the larger narrative execution mechanics on Twitter:

This unfortunate episode illustrates one of the big reasons we never spend much time on Twitter. As we often say here, “If your business depends on a platform, you don’t have a business.” Yes, if Lambert, Jerri and I spent more time on Twitter, we might have more followers. We’ll also have far less interaction (think of all the discreet and reasonable comments here, and their many links). It will all be owned by the platform.

Naked capitalism is like a poor Bavarian kingdom: remote, on all sides (as in the highly visible approach) there is a large flat expanse, and a dilapidated castle. But we have deep moats, high walls. And enough grains, goat, chicken, and root vegetables to sustain a long siege.



[ad_2]

Source link

More to explorer

Understanding Key Factors in Accidents

[ad_1] Pedestrian Safety Statistics Pedestrian safety is an urgent concern worldwide, with over 1.3 million people dying in traffic accidents annually. Pedestrians