Wall Street Journal reporter condemned for “revealing” editorials by Satoshi Nakamoto – Bitcoin News


Last week, mainstream media has been reporting that “Bitcoin’s creator Satoshi Nakamoto may be in [a] Trial in Florida. In addition, the name “Satoshi Nakamoto” has been popular in people’s discussions on social media in the past few days.

Discussions on the Internet about the mysterious creator of Bitcoin are in full swing

Last week, the long-awaited Kleiman v. Wright case started trial in Florida. This case aroused great interest in mainstream media publications, such as Fox News, this Daily mail,as well as Wall Street Journal. Vertical trends on Twitter are also show The name “Satoshi Nakamoto” has appeared in many conversations this week. According to statistics, since October 2nd, people’s interest in Bitcoin creators has increased by 48.71%. Google Trends search query score The theme is “Satoshi Nakamoto”.

Wall Street Journal reporters severely criticized Satoshi Nakamoto's
Since October 2, 2021, the topic “Satoshi Nakamoto” has been on the rise because it has seen more search queries in the past month and a half. After the Wall Street Journal reporter, Paul Vigna published his editorial titled “Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto may be exposed in the Florida trial,” and the topic “Satoshi Nakamoto” began to become popular on social media platforms such as Twitter.

The aforementioned media publications asserted in some editorials that the Florida trial can reveal the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto. Ira Kleiman, brother of the Kleiman family and the late computer forensics expert Dave Kleiman, believes that their Dave’s wealth has been manipulated.Kleiman Estate Accuse Craig Wright implemented “a plan against Dave’s estate to confiscate Dave’s Bitcoin and his rights to certain intellectual property rights related to Bitcoin technology.”

Speaking Together with Paul Vigna of the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), Kleiman’s family lawyer, Vel Freedman, explained that the plaintiffs believed they had made strong accusations against Craig Wright, who claimed to be the inventor of Bitcoin. “We believe that the evidence will show that there is a partnership to create and mine more than 1 million bitcoins,” Friedman told Vigna.

After the “Wall Street Journal” reporter published an editorial, the report was criticized for various reasons.

Skeptics criticize media reports discussing so-called revelations

After the Wall Street Journal reporter Shared this story On Twitter, Vinia was blamed for promoting Wright’s story. Wizsec Bitcoin Research is a group of researchers who have criticized Wright’s story on various occasions in the past, calling Vigna’s “Wall Street Journal” editorial “irresponsible.”

“It is irresponsible for you to deliberately ignore or downplay proven lies, forgery and fraud while expressing their claims,” ??Wizsec Said Go to Vigna on Twitter. “You deliberately introduced a scam to your readers without properly warning them that it was a scam. Any future victims in it are on you.” Another person wrote to Vigna and Ask:

What happened to the fact check?

Craig Wright’s friend, gambling mogul and billionaire Calvin Ayre believes that this lawsuit will reveal the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto.

Wright’s supporters believe the high-profile court case will solve the problem

At the same time, Wright’s followers and Bitcoin (BSV) Supporters wholeheartedly believe that this case will solve the problem once and for all.An enthusiastic follower wrote: “Dr. Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto — BSV It’s the real Bitcoin. “

Although many critics criticized Vinia’s editorial on the so-called revelations in his Wall Street Journal, many Wright supporters told Vinia that the critics just wanted to discredit Wright.

On November 15th, gambling tycoon and billionaire Calvin Al Tweet News about the Florida trial is spreading and shared a editorial Fox News wrote: “Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto may be exposed in the Florida trial.”

Al wrote on Monday: “The news of the Nakamoto trial is leaking, and now the full history of the launch of Bitcoin in Florida will have a large audience.”

Wright went on to swear that he invented Bitcoin alone – Wright’s critics still don’t believe him

So far, the case has revealed some interesting things because court officials and lawyers were told that Wright has autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Although Kleiman tried to make this unacceptable, the jury decided to consider the matter. Wright continues to argue that he invented Bitcoin himself, and Dave Kleiman was not his partner when he created the technology.

Despite the headlines in the mainstream media, many people still believe that the Florida case cannot determine whether Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto.

In addition, this artist is called “@Fractal encryptionWright’s statement was transcribed on the seventh day of the trial. Fractal encrypted Long tweet thread It started at the end of the sixth day and has been very popular. According to the transcription of Fractalencrypt, faced with numerous documents, Wright kept arguing throughout the trial that Kleiman was a friend, but not the co-creator of Bitcoin.

What do you think of the Kleiman v. Wright case and the discussions surrounding this case on social media? Please tell us your thoughts on this topic in the comments section below.

Tags in this story

Autism Spectrum Disorder, Bitcoin court case, Inventor of Bitcoin, Calvin Al, Court case, Craig Wright, Dave Kleiman, Florida Trial, Fox News, Ella Kleiman, jury, Kleiman v. Wright, litigation, Satoshi Nakamoto, Paul Wigna, Satoshi, Satoshi Nakamoto, reveal the mask, Wilfriedman, Wall Street Journal, Wizsec Bitcoin Research, Wright critics, Wright supporters, Wall Street Journal reporter

Image Source: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wikimedia Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for reference only. It is not a direct offer or invitation to buy or sell, nor is it a recommendation or endorsement of any product, service or company. Bitcoin Network Does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author assumes direct or indirect responsibility for any damage or loss caused or claimed to be caused by using or relying on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.





Source link