Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Rules on Arbitration Provision in an Employee Handbook
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled on an arbitration provision in an employee handbook. Carey v. 24 Hour Fitness, USA, Inc., No. 10-20845 (5th Cir. Jan. 25, 2012), available at http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/10/10-20845-CV0.wpd.pdf. The defendant employer issued an employee handbook that contained a provision requiring all employment-related disputes to be resolved through arbitration. The plaintiff employee signed an acknowledgment indicating that he received the handbook.
Later, the plaintiff filed an employment-related class action lawsuit against his former employer. The employer requested that the district court compel arbitration. The district court denied this request because it agreed with the plaintiff that the arbitration agreement was illusory. The employer appealed.
On appeal, the Court affirmed the judgment. Under Texas law, an arbitration clause is illusory if one party can avoid its promise to arbitrate by amending the provision or terminating it. Here, the acknowledgment signed by the plaintiff gave the employer the right to revise, delete, and add to the employee handbook. Because the employer could thus alter the arbitration agreement unilaterally, the agreement was illusory and the employer could not compel arbitration.
Press Release Contact Information:
KEITH A. CLOUSE
Clouse Dunn LLP
214.220.3833 ( fax)
Other News / Press Releases
- Are You A Victim of Wage Theft Asks California wage and hour lawyer Eric Grover
- NYC Dominos Settles Wage Theft Lawsuit for $1.3M
- What Medical Conditions Qualify an Employee for FMLA Leave?
- No One is Safe From Arbitration; Even Domestic Employees
- Posh Beverly Hills Sushi Restaurant Urasawa Fined for Wage Theft
- Study: California’s Low-Wage Workers Aren’t Receiving Court-Ordered Claims
- Proposed Bills May Bring Big Changes To California Employment Laws
- Using Facebook in Employment-Related Litigation
- First Impression Case: Fifth Circuit Rules on Ministerial Exception to Employment Discrimination Law
- An Employer Asks: Do We Have to Train an Older Worker on a New Computer System?